AI PANEL SCORE:

QSD Kid 8; Classical Science 0

It is quite well-known that many of our leading scientists and intellectuals insist that all so-called perceptions of so-called meaningful synchronistic patterns are just constructs of the human imagination. 

So, what if this interpretation is actually wrong?

What if this belief is so wrong that one can defeat it using the most elementary science and 5th-grade math!?

Thoroughly, repeatedly, and in full public view? 

We ask because this is AI’s unanimous conclusion about the case studies below. We call our data QSD or Quantitative Synchronicity Data.  

Time Clock: Total Days Without Refutation So Far

What is ‘Null Hypothesis’ Checkmate? 

If the data continues to stand, we are looking at no less than a new empirical category. AI also says QSD is “post-classical” data and does for a basic, almost prosaic-sounding reason: because the data is hard evidence that classical science can’t explain nor explain away. All of the data we introduce must meet three criteria: they must be significant to groups, meaningful in objective fashion, and improbable to degrees that can be safely and sufficiently determined. 

This research is made freely available for two reasons. 

1. If A.I.’s conclusions about this data can be falsified, we firmly believe that this should happen. Making this data available for free provides the best chance of finding true falsification, if that can be done. I will post such a refutation on this landing page. Until you see such a thing, know that this is yet to occur. 

2. By the same logic, I am obligated to inform readers of the current score. The timekeeper link above serves that purpose, making this an ongoing ‘live’ experiment. The clock is set to August 4, 2025, when I loaded the first SSRN paper in this series. Since then the QSD results have remained unrefuted to the best of my knowledge.

You won’t find any ‘swamp gas’ here. No redacted files, no rumors, no innuendo, and no possibly doctored videos. We seek to only introduce publicly available data that is authentic beyond all reasonable doubt. This way, the reader is fully empowered to reach his or her own conclusions independently.

SSRN

Although we introduced these case studies to the public earlier. However, the Social Sciences Research Network (SSRN, est. 1994) introduced our “open question” about QSD to the academic community in early August of 2025.

We don’t publish anything here unless multiple AI agree with what we are saying. Then, at SSRN, academic editors review papers to see if they meet basic academic quality-control standards. Other editors sometimes review papers at the next level, deciding they are worthy of inclusion in mailing lists.

AI says the SSRN mailing typically includes hundreds of readers or more. Plenty of skeptics, I would hope. All of the papers listed below have been distributed. AI says that ‘distributed’ paper titles get seen by dozens to hundreds of SSRN readers, providing ample opportunity for early falsification and ‘dark social’ sharing of the freely downloaded PDFs. 

These are my early results at SSRN where I have given only my name, because I want the focus on my data. I began with a ‘flagship’ paper (at bottom) that provided three different and independent examples of QSD: one was of noted mathematical significance, another rich in secular meaning, a third was religous.

I began with the so-called Tim Tebow “John 3:16” case study knowing that some people would love to shoot down any dataset with such a brazenly religious signature if they could… And good on them if they can – I say – since that would be in the greatest public interest. 

So far, crickets…

The PDFs below are best suited for desktop screens. For cell phones, it’s better to use a PDF viewer, etc. “muPDF” is excellent for cellphones and has no ads, no credit cards etc. :https://play.google.com/store/games

1. QSD-1,2,3: Our Flagship Paper: Our first published examples of QSD. The purpose here is to scientifically confirm synchronicity through three independent cases. ESSAY  PAPER

2. QSD-1 Where John 316 Meets P05 Meaningful NFL Patterns Defeat Chance in the Scientific Arena ESSAY PAPER   A follow-up to QSD-123. This paper reveals the depth of QSD-1, the Tim Tebow case study.  It provides a sample of what we shall continue to overlook as long as we “believe” that all sync patterns are based on misperception. 

3. QSD-4: The Great American Super Bowl Sequence: QSD-4 provides a second example of what we overlook”: 30 Straight Super Bowls Form a Pattern that is Orders of Magnitude Rarer than the Age of the Universe. This case study climaxes with QSD-2.   ESSAY   PAPER 

4. QSD-50 : The USA’s 1980 Statistical Miracle On Ice February 9, 2026.  ESSAY   PAPER

5. QSD-67 : Ice Hockey at the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics  February 16, 2026.  ESSAY PAPER

ESSAYS

QSD: An Emerging Post-Classical Category? A.I. Panel Review     

QSD-1: How Nearly 100 Americans Got Juked by the Read Option in 2012